In DHA Gujranwala secondary-market chat, “file” is often used as a catch-all for booking or allotment-style
documents. That shorthand hides a buyer-critical distinction: mainstream
Allocation pathway documents versus Affidavit or variant trading labels that
appear when paperwork history, attestation path, or transfer practicality differs. Paying the same psychological
price for both is how capital gets trapped in the wrong risk profile.
An Affidavit-labelled 10 Marla file may still be a legitimate instrument in a specific
deal — or it may be a thinner, harder-to-exit claim that only looks cheap next to Allocation
(PKR 31.5 Lac).
The point of this page is not to invent a fake Affidavit “market rate.” The point is to force classification,
give you a live Allocation reference, and route you to advisor confirmation before remittance.
Read the dedicated process comparison at
Affidavit vs Allocation file
before you fall in love with a discount. Then open the matching
10 Marla Allocation
rate guide and the
live file rates board
so every family member is looking at the same artefacts.
Affidavit diligence usually means higher friction: longer document stories, more questions at transfer,
and thinner resale audiences if the next buyer insists on clean Allocation wording. That does not automatically
make Affidavit “bad” — it makes Affidavit a different product. Price it as a different product. If a seller
refuses to write “Affidavit” or “Allocation” in the same message as the ask, treat that as a red flag equal
to a missing price.
EMAN HOLDINGS publishes Allocation asking levels because the marketplace board carries those
categories with transparent mid/asking tips. Affidavit deals are deal-specific. Our editorial rule is simple:
never invent a board number that does not exist; always publish the Allocation compass and the confirmation path.